On the formation of a new social stratum, termed «precariat», as a totally new phenomenon
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
On the formation of a new social stratum, termed «precariat», as a totally new phenomenon
Annotation
PII
S020736760002497-5-1
DOI
10.31857/S020736760002497-5
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Zhan T. Toschenko 
Affiliation: Institute of Sociology, RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Pages
25-45
Abstract

The article discusses a new social phenomenon - precariat, its main characteristics and structures, and compares it with other social groups. The author examines the capability of precariat to develop a specific ideology of its own and the possible emergence of the new forms of class struggle.

Keywords
society, social structure, precariat, class-in-itself, class-for-itself, labor market, employment
Received
09.12.2018
Date of publication
14.12.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
695
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2018
1

References

1. Anisimov R.I. Trud v ehpokhu neopredelennosti //Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 11.

2. Bizyukov P. Chto takoe prekariat? // Gazeta.ru. 2014. 1 maya.

3. Veretennikova K., Polyakov M. Zolotye sem'i // Versiya. 2017. № 21.

4. Volovskaya N.M., Plyusnina L.K., Rusina A.V. Inozemtseva A.V. Nezanyatoe naselenie i samozanyatost' v sibirskom regione // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. №5.

5. Gimpel'son V.E. Nuzhen li rossijskoj ehkonomike chelovecheskij kapital? Desyat' somnenij // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2016. № 10. S. 129-143.

6. Golenkova Z.T. Prekariat kak novoe yavlenie v sovremennoj strukture. Naemnyj rabotnik v sovremennoj Rossii // M.: Novyj khronograf. 2015.

7. Golodets O. 38 millionov trudosposobnykh rossiyan zanyaty neponyatno chem // Rossijskaya gazeta. 2013. 3 aprelya.

8. Grinberg R.S. Velikaya transformatsiya: nevyuchennye uroki // M., 2009.

9. Zhiznennyj mir rossiyan: 25 let spustya (konets 1980-kh — seredina 2010-kh gg.). / M., 2016.

10. Kozina I.M. Rabotniki zaemnogo truda //Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. №5.

11. Malakhov A. Allokhtony i avtokhtony: migranty kak sub'ekt sotsial'nogo vzaimodejstviya // Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 1.

12. Maleva T., Avraamova E. Osnovaniya mnogofunktsional'noj sotsial'noj politiki // Ehkonomicheskaya politika. 2016. T.11. № 2. S. 177–193.

13. Manujlova A. Nestandartnaya zanyatost' beret svoe /Kommersant', 2017, 17 oktyabrya.

14. Mekhanik A. Unizhennye i oskorblennye sovremennogo mira // Ehkspert. 2014. № 1.

15. Rossijskij rynok truda: tendentsii, instituty, strukturnye izmeneniya / M.: VShEh. 2017.

16. Sankova L.V. Prekariatizatsiya zanyatosti v sovremennoj ehkonomike: sistemnyj risk ili «osobaya» forma fleksibilizatsii // Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii. 2014. № 4(194). S. 44–53.

17. Smirnov S.N. Propisnye istiny trudovoj sfery // Mir Rossii. 2015. T. 24. №1.

18. Strebkov D.O., Shevchuk A.V. Trudovye tsennosti samostoyatel'noj i organizovannoj zanyatosti // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 1.

19. Stehnding G. Prekariat: novyj opasnyj klass. M.: 2014.

20. Toschenko Zh.T. Prekariat: ot protoklassa k novomu klassu // M.: Nauka. 2018.

21. Toschenko Zh.T. Prekariat – novyj sotsial'nyj klass // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 6.

22. Fishman L.G. Zakat «obschestva truda»; sovremennaya ideologicheskaya konstellyatsiya // Politiya. 2016. №3 (82).

23. Kharchenko V.S. Obraz zhizni rossijskikh frilanserov: sotsiologicheskij analiz // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 4. S. 54-63.

24. Chto zhelaet molodezhnyj prekariat Rossii? // Facebook. 29/01/2011. URL: www.chaskor.ru/article /chego_zhelaet_molodezhny.

25. Shkaratan O.I. Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskoe neravenstvo i ego vosproizvodstvo v sovremennoj Rossii // M. 2009.

26. Shkaratan O.I., Karacharovskij V.V., Gasyukova E.N. Prekariat: teoriya i ehmpiricheskij analiz (na materialakh oprosov v Rossii, 1994-2013) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. №12. S. 99–110.

27. Bourdieu P., Le precarite est aujourd’hui partour (Precariousness is Everywhere Novadays) // Contre-feux. Paris. 1998. R. 96-102.

28. Castel R. Les métamorphoses de la question sociale: une chronique du salariat // Paris: Fayard, 1995.

29. Cranford C.J., Vosko L.F., Zukewich N. Precarious employment in the Canadian labour market: a statistical portrait // Just labour. 2003. Vol. 3. P. 6–22.

30. Doogan K. New Capitalism: The Transformation of Work // Cambridge: Polity Press. 2008.

31. Ferguson J. Formalities of poverty: thinking about social assistance in South Africa’ // African Studies Review. 50(1). 2007. R. 71–86.

32. Hardt M., Negri A. Empire // Cambridge. MA. 2000.

33. Kalleberg A.L. Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition // American sociological review. 2009. Vol. 74. P. 1–22.

34. Munck R., Globalisation and Labour: The New ‘Great Tansformation’ // London: Zed Books. 2002.

35. Neilson B & N Rossiter N. Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception // Theory, Culture and Society. 25(710). 2008.

36. Pink D. Free Agent Nation: How America’s New Indededent Workers Are Transforming the Way We Live // New York: Warner Books. 2001.

37. Sassen S. The informal economy: between new developments and old regulations // Yale Law Journal. Summer. 1994. R. 2289–2304.

38. Seymor R. We are All Precarious – On the Concept of the “Precariat” and its Misuses. 2012.

39. Standing G. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. L. and N.Y.: Bloomsbury Academic. 2011.

40. Tangian A. Is flexible work precarious? A study based on the 4th European survey of working conditions 2005. WSI – Diskussionspapier. 2007. No 153. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21599.

41. Vives A., Gonzáleza F., Moncadae S., Llorense C., Benach J. Measuring precarious employment in times of crisis: the revised Employment Precariousness Scale (EPRES) in Spain // Gaceta Sanitaria. 2015. No 29(5). P. 379–382.

42. Vosko Leah F. Managing the Margins. Gender, Citizenship and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment // New York. 2010.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate